PSO and the OCC Don’t Follow Their Own Rules

PSO and the OCC Don’t Follow Their Own Rules

The Standard Alternate to a Smart Meter in the United States and

Canada is the analog meter.  The predominant meter listed in the Oklahoma Corporation Utility Rules (OCC), and the Customer Contract filed by PSO at the OCC, is the analog meter. 

Why has PSO refused the retention of the reliable analog meters in Oklahoma?  PSO's penalty rate to refuse the "offer" of the Smart Meter is nearly the highest in the Nation. 

PSO testified before the Oklahoma Corporation Commission that 1,300 customers refused their "offer".  When asked by the Attorney General's office to present evidence, PSO refused.  PSO's narrative changed three times in the same case before the OCC. PSO testified that 1,300 refused the offer, another witness testified that 250 refused and another that only 150 customers will refuse once they receive the notice of the $71 one-time charge and $28.00 penalty per month.  PSO spokesman Stan Whiteford told the press last Thursday that only 60 customers have refused the Smart Meter. So, how many is it?

PSO customers who want to retain their reliable analog should be extended that option at little or no fee.  During the case before the OCC the Attorney General's office submitted eleven pages of evidence from other states that allowed the retention of the analog meters at a low or no monthly fee.  The Administrative Law Judge, Ben Jackson of the OCC ignored the eleven pages of evidence in his recommendation to the three Commissioners.

Facts:

• ·         Analog meters installed the 1950's are still metering electricity
• ·         Smart Meters have a lifespan of 5 to 7 years according to Congressional testimony in October 2015 (if they don't malfunction, overheat or explode from a power surge).
• ·         Analogs are plentiful and still sold in the United States. They are also manufactured in other countries as are the smart meters.
• ·         G.E. no longer manufactures the smart meters PSO purchased and continues to install.  G.E. sold their metering division in April 2015
• ·         PSO's proposed AMR smart meter with the transmitter turned off produces electromagnetic radiation and still has the liability to arc and overheat.  PSO's AMR is a 10 year old used meter with an indemnity clause attached, implying the meter is hazardous.

There was no factual disclosure to the unsuspecting public when PSO launched the deployment of the Smart Meters.  Three to five percent of the public is electro-sensitive to radio frequency radiation and electromagnetic radiation produced by the smart meters.  The only safe meter for the sensitive is the analog meter.  There are smart meter health cases filed with the OCC which have no resolution after 3 years.  

Why has PSO spent two and a half years at the OCC at great legal expense (passed on to the rate payers) trying to deny those with health related issues the right to retain the standard (analog) alternative meter?  The attitude of PSO toward their customers has been punitive and discriminating toward the disabled, the elderly and the poor.  PSO should provide customers with the alternate analog meter, read four times per year (PSO’s OCC filed requirement) at a reasonable fee.

PSO should have to follow their own rules. The Standard Alternate meter to the Smart Meter (AMI), is the analog meter. PSO should allow customers to keep their analog meters.

Smart Meter Fires (2016): Burning meters, burning questions, shocking answers

PSO’S DECEPTION

PSO vs The People: Who’s Lying Now?

PSO has claimed: Smart Meters Don’t Collect Personal Data

And yet, on August 15, 2016, the Attorney General’s office sent a letter to the Oklahoma Corporation Commission instructing them to adopt rules protecting our personal privacyin the Electric Utility Rules (Chapter 35 of Title 165). These rules were intended to protect our personal data other than usage collected and transmitted by the smart meters.

In the fall of 2015 Assistant Attorney General Jerry Sanger said the he understood the “Utilities have the potential to profit MORE from the customer data sold than the consumption of electricity” (Forbes and Politico). The Oklahoma Corporation Commission was to promulgate the rules more than five years ago to protect our privacy.

Update on Smart Meters in Tulsa

via Tulsa 9.12 group:

 On Aug. the 4th PSO customers on the by-pass list received a letter with an indemnity clause as a condition for not accepting the "offer" of the AMI meter. That is, you have to sign a release of liability letter for PSO to install your non-communicating meter. No previous mention of that in OCC hearings.

 Why would the OCC and the Attorney General's office allow PSO to install a hazardous meter on a dwelling or building and force the occupants to forfeit their safety and their right to hold the Company liable for any harm the meter may cause?

 Tulsa 9.12 is working with the State Attorney General's Office and legal counsel on whether PSO can require the 520,000 non-opt-out customers receiving meters from their inventory to sign a release of liability.

Forbes: Smart Meters Challenge Privacy Rights

Smart Meters: Between Economic Benefits And Privacy Concerns

 An advanced metering infrastructure smart meter monitors energy con-
sumption near the Catering and Conference Center at the Washington
Navy Yard. The smart meter records energy consumption data every
15 minutes and sends information to a single, secure system allowing
managers to monitor and control energy systems throughout the install-
ation. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

  Next generation utility meters better known as “smart meters”, used to measure remotely and in real time gas, water, and – above all – electricity consumption,  are now being deployed by several companies in many States across the U.S. While growth has leveled, after legislative incentives drove an initial boom between 2009 and 2012,  installations are expected to make steady progress over the next 10 years.

French Ban On Wifi In Daycare Centers

  (NaturalNews) The French National Assembly has adopted a bill to limit exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) generated by wireless technologies - cell phones, tablets, Wi-Fi etc. This bill will mean the following:

• A ban on Wi-Fi in all childcare facilities for children under the age of 3.
• Cell phone manufacturers will have to recommend the use of hand-free kits.
• A ban on all advertising targeting children under 14.

Canadian Backlash To Wifi Schools

Are We Cooking Our Kids?

  "What I urge of all of you is to rise above the mud slinging and the pretend science and be the ones who finally show integrity after all this time. You might think your task is limited in its scope, but you are in a unique position to provide a tool to the lonely voices on the school boards who might want to take precautionary action. You could suggest that dramatically safer standards be set in places where children are forced by law to spend six hours a day for their entire childhood."